requestId:68499aabac0fd5.04184697.
“Confucian Confucian of Zhusheng’s Confucian Family”: Zhang Taiyan and “Zhang Zi is Confucianism” Confucianism
Author: Yang Haiwen
Source: Author Authorized Confucian Network Published
Original “Literature, History and Philosophy” Issue 2, 2017
Time: Confucius was in the 2568th year of Dingyou, Gengyin
Jesus May 3, 2017
Abstract: Zhang Taiyan has at most five literary and cultural touches and the “Sweetheart GardenBrave is Confucianism”: In the early years, the two types of them were still considered to be highly discussed, and in the old years, the three types were already actively participated. “The Confucian Confucian of the Zhusheng family” is his painting of dragon-touching: the Confucian Confucianism was inherited by Zhusheng, and Zhusheng was the conqueror of the Confucian Confucian; the Confucian Confucian faction of the Zhusheng family. “The sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred sacred From Zhang Taiyan’s outstanding participation in his late years, we can see that the “Zhangzi is Confucianism” issue is not something that people think is common to the common thoughts of Confucianism and Taoism, but has unique connotations of thinking history, and the reason should gain its own position in thinking history.
Keywords: Zhuangzi; 吧; Confucianism of Zhusheng; “Zhuangzi is Confucianism” controversy
Zhuangzi has a close relationship with Confucianism: From the perspective of Zhuangzi, this relationship belongs to the thought of the mutual complementation of Confucianism; from the perspective of Zhuangzi, this relationship is transformed into the question of “Zhuangzi is Confucianism”. The former is a traditional viewpoint, well known to everyone; the latter began in Korea (768-824), and there are many people who are interested in the Tao, but few people know the details. In addition to the mutual complementation of Confucianism and Taoism, “Zhuangzi is Confucianism” innovated and enriched the connection between Zhuangzi and Confucian thoughts and history, and opened up and proved it a proof state of strange and righteousness. Zhang Taiyan, a major scholar of Zhuang, has at most five literary works (two in his early years and three in his late years) and uses the “Confucian Confucian family of Zhuangsheng” as the eye-catching pendant, which allows us to manage the historical evolution of the “Bangzi is Confucianism” and its unique connotation.
1. “Ruer’s Rebellion”
In September 1906,Zhang Taiyan, who lives in japan (Japan), took over as the editor of “Japan News” and established a national lecture. “Edited by Zhang Taiyan’s Senior (Additional Version)” states: “The National Academy of Sciences has published the “A Brief Discourse of the National Academy of Sciences”, which was published in the book by the Japanese (Japan) Hidekōsou Club. It was published in September 1906, and was signed in the 64th year of Huangdi Yuan Dynasty [ii], and it collected three articles: “Study of Language”, “Study of Literature”, and “Study of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of The “A Brief Discourse of the Book of the National Citizens” written by Zhang, written by Zhang in the eighth and ninth chapter of Bingwu, published on July 20th and August 20th….”[iii]
The “A Brief Discourse of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book of the Book It is said to be none. There are many people in “Zhuangzi” who say “Gengsang Chu”, Xu Wugui, and Yanyang, but are there any one Tianzi Fang? Because of his recommendation to Xu Zifang, he said that what he learned must be like, is Xu Wugui also a teacher of Zhuzi? Nan Guo Ziqi’s words are urgently claimed by Zhuangzi, is he also Zhuangzi’s teacher? [iv]
Korea is the first promoter of the “Zhangzi is Confucianism”. His “Preface to Sending Wang Xiucai” says: “When Xiaoxia learned, there was Tianzifang after him; after Zifang, it flowed into Zhuzhou: Therefore, Zhou’s book likes to call Zifang as a human being.bringing message board.”[v] When thinking about this paragraph, the most problematic sentence is the second sentence, and the third sentence also has problems because of the second sentence. The review of “History of Chinese Ethics” written by Cai Yuanpei (1868-1940) during his time in Germany: “He said he did not know the basis.” [vi] Zhang Taiyan took the third sentence and used this to prove the second sentence to come to the conclusion of “its saying it is not true”, which clearly does not mean that it will become a Korean healing. In fact, this kind of comments is still outside the question of “Zangzi is Confucianism”.
The “Editor of Zhang Taiyan (Additional Version)” records: In the 33rd year of Guangcheng (1907), “on the 20th day of the 10th spring (January 23, 1908), the “National Civic Journal” was published in the 12th year of Dingwei, and the “Social Discourse” contains two letters “A Certain Men Discussing the National Civic Journal”, namely “A Certificate of Different Records” Volume 2 “A Certificate of Discussing the National Civic Journal” and “A Certificate of Discussing the National Civic Journal”&
發佈留言